Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 30115 for de.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6217 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6217 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6212 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Chew, 2014 WI App 116, ¶7, 358 Wis. 2d 368, 856 N.W.2d 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239778 - 2019-05-01
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Chew, 2014 WI App 116, ¶7, 358 Wis. 2d 368, 856 N.W.2d 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239778 - 2019-05-01
[PDF]
Charles Chvala v. Danford C. Bubolz
). We are not bound by the trial court's conclusions and review the matter de novo. First Nat'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
). We are not bound by the trial court's conclusions and review the matter de novo. First Nat'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶26, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103116 - 2017-09-21
. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶26, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott T. Bidwell
). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Sinks, 168 Wis.2d 245, 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Sinks, 168 Wis.2d 245, 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
On certiorari review, we review de novo the Board’s decision, not the decision of the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088592 - 2026-03-10
On certiorari review, we review de novo the Board’s decision, not the decision of the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088592 - 2026-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
will review the application of the facts to a statute—in this case § 799.01(1)(d)—de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59065 - 2011-01-18
will review the application of the facts to a statute—in this case § 799.01(1)(d)—de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59065 - 2011-01-18