Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 68274 for did.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was in effect, subsequent statutory revisions did not affect the parts of the statutes that are relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032815 - 2025-11-04
was in effect, subsequent statutory revisions did not affect the parts of the statutes that are relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032815 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
on the grounds that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to request a preliminary breath screening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4695 - 2017-09-19
on the grounds that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to request a preliminary breath screening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4695 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Sutherland
Given those qualifications, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2554 - 2017-09-19
Given those qualifications, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2554 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas Leair
during the trial. We also conclude the court properly denied Leair’s motion for a new trial and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4782 - 2017-09-19
during the trial. We also conclude the court properly denied Leair’s motion for a new trial and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 199
did not support its decision. It reversed the board’s decision and granted the Blocks a variance.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29820 - 2014-09-15
did not support its decision. It reversed the board’s decision and granted the Blocks a variance.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. The Board contends that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14014 - 2014-09-15
Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. The Board contends that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14014 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael Wendt v. John H. Blazek
a judicial declaration that the easement did not include a right to use and maintain the pier. The Wendts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3007 - 2017-09-19
a judicial declaration that the easement did not include a right to use and maintain the pier. The Wendts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3007 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
procedure, we conclude that the procedure did not violate Peters’ constitutional due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15780 - 2005-03-31
procedure, we conclude that the procedure did not violate Peters’ constitutional due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15780 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and siren to initiate a traffic stop. The SUV did not pull over for another two miles. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31585 - 2008-01-22
and siren to initiate a traffic stop. The SUV did not pull over for another two miles. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31585 - 2008-01-22
Danny L. Schroeder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
was ambiguous and, therefore, that it did not preclude payment under the policy’s uninsured motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3552 - 2005-03-31
was ambiguous and, therefore, that it did not preclude payment under the policy’s uninsured motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3552 - 2005-03-31