Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
with a counseling requirement. The trial court then adjudicated Obriecht guilty on the outstanding charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15669 - 2005-03-31
with a counseling requirement. The trial court then adjudicated Obriecht guilty on the outstanding charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15669 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of trial counsel: (1) as a result of his attorney’s failure to object to a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
ineffective assistance of trial counsel: (1) as a result of his attorney’s failure to object to a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion in limine prohibiting Peterson from erecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37590 - 2014-09-15
to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion in limine prohibiting Peterson from erecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37590 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kieth M. Ferries v. Gerald W. Laabs
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11806 - 2017-09-21
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11806 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey J. Grassl
. Affirmed. CANE, P.J. Jeffrey Grassl appeals from a conviction after a jury trial for misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13360 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. CANE, P.J. Jeffrey Grassl appeals from a conviction after a jury trial for misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13360 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial on four grounds: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) the denial of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
trial on four grounds: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) the denial of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
modification. Eckstein argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59313 - 2014-09-15
modification. Eckstein argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59313 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and that $71,000 would fairly compensate her. Schwibinger contends the trial court’s denial of her motion to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58971 - 2011-01-18
and that $71,000 would fairly compensate her. Schwibinger contends the trial court’s denial of her motion to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58971 - 2011-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of the County on an issue, and that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. I affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145366 - 2015-07-29
of the County on an issue, and that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. I affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145366 - 2015-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the denial of a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Wausau Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
, and the denial of a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Wausau Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23