Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 58511 for speedy trial.
Search results 17611 - 17620 of 58511 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Gary Tate
was inadequate to give him notice of the crimes, that trial counsel was deficient for not challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16195 - 2017-09-21
was inadequate to give him notice of the crimes, that trial counsel was deficient for not challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16195 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
count of aggravated battery, and one count of substantial battery. The trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148642 - 2017-09-21
count of aggravated battery, and one count of substantial battery. The trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148642 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
into probate over their objections. The Appellants challenge both the trial court’s findings of fact and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36297 - 2009-04-29
into probate over their objections. The Appellants challenge both the trial court’s findings of fact and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36297 - 2009-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of trial counsel: (1) as a result of his attorney’s failure to object to a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
ineffective assistance of trial counsel: (1) as a result of his attorney’s failure to object to a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
appeals the property division entered in his divorce judgment.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
appeals the property division entered in his divorce judgment.[1] He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
State v. Travis S. Wimpie
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Wimpie claims that: (1) the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4087 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Wimpie claims that: (1) the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4087 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary Tate
as applied, Tate argues that the complaint was inadequate to give him notice of the crimes, that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16195 - 2005-03-31
as applied, Tate argues that the complaint was inadequate to give him notice of the crimes, that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sharon Ferries v. Kieth M. Ferries
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11807 - 2017-09-21
of the “newly-discovered evidence” of the policy’s effectiveness. The trial court granted Sharon’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11807 - 2017-09-21
State v. Willie E. Fleming
’ imprisonment. Thereafter, Fleming brought a postconviction motion. After a five-day hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
’ imprisonment. Thereafter, Fleming brought a postconviction motion. After a five-day hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14