Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17621 - 17630 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17621 - 17630 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 63
. Interpreting a statute and applying it to undisputed facts is a matter of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172514 - 2017-09-21
. Interpreting a statute and applying it to undisputed facts is a matter of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172514 - 2017-09-21
National Operating v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
Whether claim preclusion applies in a given case is a question of law which we decide de novo. DePratt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2005-03-31
Whether claim preclusion applies in a given case is a question of law which we decide de novo. DePratt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
Landshire Fast Foods of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
of Review ¶8 We review summary judgment motions de novo. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee, 225 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6338 - 2005-05-03
of Review ¶8 We review summary judgment motions de novo. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee, 225 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6338 - 2005-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10928 - 2006-01-09
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10928 - 2006-01-09
Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75496 - 2011-12-19
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25, 283
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75496 - 2011-12-19
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
voluntarily waived de novo. State v. Santiago, 206 Wis.2d 3, 18, 556 N.W.2d 687, 692 (1996). “Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10976 - 2005-03-31
voluntarily waived de novo. State v. Santiago, 206 Wis.2d 3, 18, 556 N.W.2d 687, 692 (1996). “Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10976 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170143 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170143 - 2017-09-21