Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17621 - 17630 of 29827 for des.
Search results 17621 - 17630 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in exercising its discretion is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Garfoot v. Fireman’s Fund Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162250 - 2017-09-21
in exercising its discretion is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Garfoot v. Fireman’s Fund Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
exists is a question of law, which we review de novo. The existence of a new factor does not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53891 - 2014-09-15
exists is a question of law, which we review de novo. The existence of a new factor does not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
admitted he took Lydia’s phones. Nowak ordered Adam to bring the phones to the De Pere Police Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123444 - 2017-09-21
admitted he took Lydia’s phones. Nowak ordered Adam to bring the phones to the De Pere Police Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123444 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 172
to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42674 - 2014-09-15
to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42674 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Karen C.
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
Jeffrey S. * v. Thomas A.f. *
, Adam's parents argue that since the trial court treated the issue as one of law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9151 - 2010-03-02
, Adam's parents argue that since the trial court treated the issue as one of law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9151 - 2010-03-02
State v. Donald J. Buford
reviews de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Moreover, a reviewing court need not address both parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Moreover, a reviewing court need not address both parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous; however, we determine de novo whether or when a seizure occurred. Id. ¶8 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
clearly erroneous; however, we determine de novo whether or when a seizure occurred. Id. ¶8 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2014-02-25
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2014-02-25