Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17621 - 17630 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17621 - 17630 of 29823 for des.
State v. Warren A. Goodman
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Id. ¶7 Robinson’s postconviction motion was denied without a hearing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133770 - 2015-01-28
we review de novo. Id. ¶7 Robinson’s postconviction motion was denied without a hearing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133770 - 2015-01-28
1522 on the Lake v. Nella Groysman
de novo review by the circuit court. ¶4 On September 1, 2005, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26130 - 2006-03-31
de novo review by the circuit court. ¶4 On September 1, 2005, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26130 - 2006-03-31
WI App 138 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP225-CR Complete Tit...
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2012-12-18
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2012-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41416 - 2009-09-28
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41416 - 2009-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 06, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28315 - 2007-03-05
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28315 - 2007-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
will not disturb the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
will not disturb the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
CVW v. Lawrence M. Stress
interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis.2d 598, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis.2d 598, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2010-03-16
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2010-03-16
Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14555 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14555 - 2005-03-31