Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17631 - 17640 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17631 - 17640 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
State v. Bobbie K.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
State v. Anthony Lentowski
¾that of resentencing the defendant¾de novo. We conclude, however, that a brief discussion of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
¾that of resentencing the defendant¾de novo. We conclude, however, that a brief discussion of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
is also de novo. Campion v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 172 Wis.2d 405, 410, 493 N.W.2d 244, 246 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9240 - 2015-02-18
is also de novo. Campion v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 172 Wis.2d 405, 410, 493 N.W.2d 244, 246 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9240 - 2015-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29624 - 2007-07-10
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29624 - 2007-07-10
State v. Lonny Mayer
is whether the evidence adduced is sufficient to permit the instruction, our review is de novo, State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2014-06-02
is whether the evidence adduced is sufficient to permit the instruction, our review is de novo, State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2014-06-02
WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1202 Complete Title of...
is a question of law we review de novo. Wood v. City of Madison, 2003 WI 24, ¶12, 260 Wis. 2d 71, 659 N.W.2d 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107935 - 2014-03-25
is a question of law we review de novo. Wood v. City of Madison, 2003 WI 24, ¶12, 260 Wis. 2d 71, 659 N.W.2d 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107935 - 2014-03-25
State v. Dustin J. Johnson
the ultimate application of the law to the facts de novo. See id. ¶14 Johnson asserts his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2008-02-25
the ultimate application of the law to the facts de novo. See id. ¶14 Johnson asserts his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2008-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which “is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
interpretation, which “is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27