Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17651 - 17660 of 65135 for or b.
Search results 17651 - 17660 of 65135 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
THE PATERNITY OF S.L.V.K.: TED B. VALLEJOS, RESPONDENT, V. GARY KRAMSCHUSTER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298729 - 2020-10-27
THE PATERNITY OF S.L.V.K.: TED B. VALLEJOS, RESPONDENT, V. GARY KRAMSCHUSTER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298729 - 2020-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
of the same child, the granddaughters of his girlfriend, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1)(b).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131603 - 2014-12-16
of the same child, the granddaughters of his girlfriend, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1)(b).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131603 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Jeffery Rittenhouse
for not 1 His maximum exposure was 42 years. See WIS. STAT. § 939.50 (3)(b) and (e). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2573 - 2017-09-19
for not 1 His maximum exposure was 42 years. See WIS. STAT. § 939.50 (3)(b) and (e). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2573 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Singleton
§§ 943.32(1)(b) & (2), 939.641(2), and 939.32, STATS. Singleton also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
§§ 943.32(1)(b) & (2), 939.641(2), and 939.32, STATS. Singleton also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Ray A. Peterson v. Mark Baker
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV RAY A. PETERSON D/B/A MASTER BUILDERS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5501 - 2017-09-19
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV RAY A. PETERSON D/B/A MASTER BUILDERS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5501 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
(4)(a)2 and 125.07(4)(b). ¶13 Hatcher claims that Fitzgerald had no reason to suspect that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
(4)(a)2 and 125.07(4)(b). ¶13 Hatcher claims that Fitzgerald had no reason to suspect that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN, CINDY O'DONNELL, STEVEN B. CASPERSON, STEPHEN M. PUCKETT, SAM SCHNEITER, TIMOTHY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27912 - 2014-09-15
, MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN, CINDY O'DONNELL, STEVEN B. CASPERSON, STEPHEN M. PUCKETT, SAM SCHNEITER, TIMOTHY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27912 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it did not consider probation at the sentencing hearing: [B]ut because the recommendation was a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
that it did not consider probation at the sentencing hearing: [B]ut because the recommendation was a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 940.06, 940.21, 940.225 (1), 940.305, 940.31, 941.327 (2) (b) 4., 943.02, 943.10 (2), 943.23 (1g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189363 - 2017-09-21
, 940.06, 940.21, 940.225 (1), 940.305, 940.31, 941.327 (2) (b) 4., 943.02, 943.10 (2), 943.23 (1g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189363 - 2017-09-21
City of Berlin v. Jane M. Bartol
for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, first offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7185 - 2005-03-31
for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, first offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7185 - 2005-03-31