Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17661 - 17670 of 29942 for des.

State v. Bryan Lee Hudson
counsel's performance was deficient, and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2010-04-20

COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the complaint presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46536 - 2010-02-01

State v. Christa Brojanac
the record de novo. State v. Coogan, 154 Wis. 2d 387, 395 n.1, 453 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1990). We may only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2963 - 2005-03-31

State v. John C. Johnson
which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment of the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2276 - 2011-07-18

Patrick Heil v. Green Bay Police and Fire Commission
¶6 All issues presented raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4138 - 2015-07-16

State v. Samuel Jones
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. at ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2009-03-08

COURT OF APPEALS
beginning his argument by telling us that we are reviewing a question of law, using the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137952 - 2015-03-18

State v. Chad J. Knoll
proceeding, involve questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Howard-Hastings, 218 Wis. 2d 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dean P. Laing v. Adams County Planning and Zoning Department
). These are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. The canons of statutory construction apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8659 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Steven A. Conway
presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8680 - 2017-09-19