Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17671 - 17680 of 30115 for de.
Search results 17671 - 17680 of 30115 for de.
National Operating v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
Whether claim preclusion applies in a given case is a question of law which we decide de novo. DePratt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2009-08-12
Whether claim preclusion applies in a given case is a question of law which we decide de novo. DePratt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2009-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
determination, we apply the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
determination, we apply the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶8 Under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85795 - 2009-07-20
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶8 Under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85795 - 2009-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2015-03-15
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2015-03-15
2008 WI APP 149
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26
State v. William D.H.
fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law.”). We review the question de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7059 - 2005-03-31
fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law.”). We review the question de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7059 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joel P. Hoffman
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. As to the performance prong, we determine whether trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4785 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. As to the performance prong, we determine whether trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4785 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chad J. Knoll
proceeding, involve questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Howard-Hastings, 218 Wis. 2d 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31
proceeding, involve questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Howard-Hastings, 218 Wis. 2d 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
situation is a determination of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Hyndman, 170 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86128 - 2012-08-21
situation is a determination of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Hyndman, 170 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86128 - 2012-08-21
WI App 98 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP476 Complete Title of ...
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86094 - 2005-03-31
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86094 - 2005-03-31