Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17671 - 17680 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17671 - 17680 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted and italics added). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted and italics added). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144546 - 2017-09-21
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joseph P. Sepanek, Jr. v. M & I Bank of Burlington
of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11238 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11238 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joel P. Hoffman
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. As to the performance prong, we determine whether trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4785 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. As to the performance prong, we determine whether trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 63
. Interpreting a statute and applying it to undisputed facts is a matter of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172514 - 2017-09-21
. Interpreting a statute and applying it to undisputed facts is a matter of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 96
they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42388 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42388 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Karleen K. Raasch
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21