Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17671 - 17680 of 68502 for did.
Search results 17671 - 17680 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
arrest. We disagree, and conclude that Foley’s detention was reasonable and did not amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140979 - 2015-04-29
arrest. We disagree, and conclude that Foley’s detention was reasonable and did not amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140979 - 2015-04-29
State v. Henry L. Williams
and Williams answered yes, and also stated in response to the court’s question that he did not have any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3154 - 2005-03-31
and Williams answered yes, and also stated in response to the court’s question that he did not have any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3154 - 2005-03-31
Portage County Department of Human Services v. Rebecca E.
and three separate fathers. Becky did not appear. Apparently there had been a plan to have her appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3387 - 2005-03-31
and three separate fathers. Becky did not appear. Apparently there had been a plan to have her appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3387 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Road. The DOT did not take any of North Mayfair’s property as a part of the Swan Boulevard project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208336 - 2018-02-15
Road. The DOT did not take any of North Mayfair’s property as a part of the Swan Boulevard project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208336 - 2018-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was in effect, subsequent statutory revisions did not affect the parts of the statutes that are relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032815 - 2025-11-04
was in effect, subsequent statutory revisions did not affect the parts of the statutes that are relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032815 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
and thus did not recuse herself from the case. No. 01-2167 3 ¶4 After a four-day bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19
and thus did not recuse herself from the case. No. 01-2167 3 ¶4 After a four-day bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Fred H. Geiger, Jr. v. Wisconsin Health Care LiabilityInsurance Plan
stated that Geiger's suit was untimely as to the Fund because Geiger did not add the fund as a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8754 - 2017-09-19
stated that Geiger's suit was untimely as to the Fund because Geiger did not add the fund as a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8754 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to a judgment of foreclosure, but the court did not actually enter a foreclosure judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92106 - 2014-09-15
was entitled to a judgment of foreclosure, but the court did not actually enter a foreclosure judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92106 - 2014-09-15
State v. Randy D. Stafford
professional did have a conflict of interest that was not recognized by the parties or the court until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31
professional did have a conflict of interest that was not recognized by the parties or the court until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. at ¶7 (quoting Bilder, 112 Wis. 2d at 554-56). ¶4 We concluded in Hancock I that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178149 - 2017-09-21
. at ¶7 (quoting Bilder, 112 Wis. 2d at 554-56). ¶4 We concluded in Hancock I that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178149 - 2017-09-21