Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17681 - 17690 of 50086 for our.

[PDF] Gary Tate v. David H. Schwarz
Wis. 2d 312, 322, 405 N.W.2d 781 (Ct. App. 1987). Our review of a probation revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2709 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Carlos Perez
, we consult a standard dictionary. See Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d at 404. We note that our use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16254 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Safer Foods, Inc., 22 Wis. 2d 478, 126 N.W.2d 14 (1964), supports our conclusion that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158356 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James L. Blackburn
Wis.2d 127, 131-32, 479 N.W.2d 566, 568-69 (Ct. App. 1991). In interpreting a statute, our purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-Rodriguez saying they “believe a fresh start would be in the best interests of our client” to allow her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134259 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 293 (7th Cir. 1995). Our supreme court has acknowledged a striking difference between a “citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181999 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Benjamin M.R.
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(e), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10062 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
convictions. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641855 - 2023-04-12

WI App 50 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1282-CR Complete Tit...
as a prior offense because it is not a “conviction” under § 343.307(1)(d). Adhering to our supreme court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109954 - 2014-05-27

wi app 5 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3029 Complete Title of ...
discretion, our review is de novo when that decision depends purely on legal issues, as it does here. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74804 - 2012-01-24