Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17691 - 17700 of 70071 for his.
Search results 17691 - 17700 of 70071 for his.
State v. Kevin Harris
a circuit court order granting Kevin Harris’s postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5652 - 2005-03-31
a circuit court order granting Kevin Harris’s postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5652 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas A. Greve
his sentencing memorandum is used in a subsequent criminal trial. (3) Whether a defendant's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16667 - 2005-03-31
his sentencing memorandum is used in a subsequent criminal trial. (3) Whether a defendant's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Greve
constitutional right to due process is violated when his sentencing memorandum is used in a subsequent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16667 - 2017-09-21
constitutional right to due process is violated when his sentencing memorandum is used in a subsequent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16667 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
affirming his judgment of conviction and sentence and upholding the circuit court's order denying his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215158 - 2018-09-19
affirming his judgment of conviction and sentence and upholding the circuit court's order denying his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215158 - 2018-09-19
Frontsheet
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Soto contends that his right under Wis. Stat. § 971.04(1)(g
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84843 - 2012-09-24
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Soto contends that his right under Wis. Stat. § 971.04(1)(g
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84843 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
WI APP 47
to obtain a buccal swab of his cheek for DNA testing was lacking. We reject both these contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168383 - 2017-09-21
to obtain a buccal swab of his cheek for DNA testing was lacking. We reject both these contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168383 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State ex rel. Drankovich v. Murphy
did not specifically inform him of his right to counsel. On the day of his sentence, Drankovich told
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases17.pdf - 2009-11-17
did not specifically inform him of his right to counsel. On the day of his sentence, Drankovich told
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases17.pdf - 2009-11-17
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Maurizzi
a judgment convicting him of burglary. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8212 - 2017-09-19
a judgment convicting him of burglary. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8212 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael Mackessy
.[1] Michael Mackessy appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4408 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Michael Mackessy appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4408 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. David A. Saddy, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence to remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64239 - 2011-05-16
CURIAM. David A. Saddy, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence to remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64239 - 2011-05-16