Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30471 - 2014-09-15
has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nancy Leibly v. Ronald P. Leibly
. Ronald did not appear for the hearing. No. 98-2670-FT 3 Ronald filed a motion for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14509 - 2017-09-21
. Ronald did not appear for the hearing. No. 98-2670-FT 3 Ronald filed a motion for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14509 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to reopen. ¶4 Fricano appealed from the municipal court order, seeking de novo review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49797 - 2010-05-11
to reopen. ¶4 Fricano appealed from the municipal court order, seeking de novo review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49797 - 2010-05-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Kelly Enright Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754942 - 2024-01-25
. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Kelly Enright Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754942 - 2024-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficiently points to a deficiency in the plea colloquy is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91093 - 2014-09-15
sufficiently points to a deficiency in the plea colloquy is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91093 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959253 - 2025-05-21
we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959253 - 2025-05-21
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
. ¶5 We review probable cause under a de novo standard of review.[2] County of Jefferson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
. ¶5 We review probable cause under a de novo standard of review.[2] County of Jefferson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959253 - 2025-05-21
we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959253 - 2025-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
even though the party has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30471 - 2007-10-01
even though the party has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30471 - 2007-10-01
State v. Mary Boyer
by § 161.41(3r), Stats. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we analyze de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8718 - 2005-03-31
by § 161.41(3r), Stats. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we analyze de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8718 - 2005-03-31