Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 2576 for dnr.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994) (holding that “when an appellant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248578 - 2019-10-09

COURT OF APPEALS
a statute will apply retroactively” because “[a]ll statutes have effective dates.” Salzman v. DNR, 168 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31090 - 2007-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” Baxter v. DNR, 165 Wis. 2d 298, 312, 477
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77594 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in a statute.” Rotfeld v. DNR, 147 Wis. 2d 720, 726, 434 N.W.2d 617 (Ct. App. 1988) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380690 - 2021-06-29

COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994) (An appellant who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92103 - 2013-01-28

NOS Communications, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
is accorded to the agency’s decision.” Sterlingworth Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. DNR, 205 Wis. 2d 710, 720-21, 556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5514 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sir S. M. L.
a concession. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994) (arguments not refuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19779 - 2005-09-28

[PDF] NOTICE
. That is plainly incorrect. ¶13 Watertown incurred its expenses when it complied with DNR and EPA directives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51117 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Harnischfeger Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. App. 1990); City of La Crosse v. DNR, 120 Wis. 2d 168, 178, 353 N.W.2d 68, 73 (Ct. App. 1984
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16860 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jerry L. Meana v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
of the agency, not the court. Barnes v. DNR, 178 Wis.2d 290, 302, 506 N.W.2d 155, 160 (Ct. App. 1993), aff'd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9222 - 2017-09-19