Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
Attorney’s Office to the county criminal court judges was an improper ex parte communication. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31
Attorney’s Office to the county criminal court judges was an improper ex parte communication. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on the recording that he was there voluntarily. When the reenactment was finished, the police arrested Tolonen.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61400 - 2011-03-22
on the recording that he was there voluntarily. When the reenactment was finished, the police arrested Tolonen.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61400 - 2011-03-22
State v. Dural Nicholson
person as the fruits of an alleged illegal arrest.[2] This court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8439 - 2005-03-31
person as the fruits of an alleged illegal arrest.[2] This court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8439 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dillis V. Allen
otherwise noted. [2] Allen’s discovery demands are not part of the record; the parties agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
otherwise noted. [2] Allen’s discovery demands are not part of the record; the parties agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Richard K. Freye
) a police officer’s frisk of him violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12898 - 2017-09-21
) a police officer’s frisk of him violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12898 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
State v. Thomas G. Kramer
invoked his Fifth Amendment right to counsel during a standoff with police prior to being in custody; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
invoked his Fifth Amendment right to counsel during a standoff with police prior to being in custody; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
State v. Kevin L. Paulson
)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f). [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18026 - 2005-05-04
)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f). [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18026 - 2005-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56318 - 2014-09-15
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56318 - 2014-09-15