Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 6143 for sheriff.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 6143 for sheriff.
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
County (Arizona) Sheriff’s Department for documentation to comply with the IAD, copies of which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
County (Arizona) Sheriff’s Department for documentation to comply with the IAD, copies of which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Ty L.
against having Ty transported to the hearing by the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13389 - 2017-09-21
against having Ty transported to the hearing by the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
, Rooni argues that the sheriff’s deputy lacked probable cause to arrest him. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
, Rooni argues that the sheriff’s deputy lacked probable cause to arrest him. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
. Meinhardt argues that the deputy sheriff had no probable cause to stop him and thus the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3547 - 2005-03-31
. Meinhardt argues that the deputy sheriff had no probable cause to stop him and thus the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on a conviction for obstructing an officer. The allegation was that Lukas obstructed a deputy sheriff who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28530 - 2014-09-15
on a conviction for obstructing an officer. The allegation was that Lukas obstructed a deputy sheriff who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28530 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Marathon County Sheriff, Respondent-Respondent. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
, Marathon County Sheriff, Respondent-Respondent. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Stank
, a Washington county sheriff’s detective entered Stank’s property. Next to the semi-trailer, the detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
, a Washington county sheriff’s detective entered Stank’s property. Next to the semi-trailer, the detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Karl H. Amenson
any investigation of any kind into the facts of the case, but relied on the Sheriff Office’s reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5381 - 2017-09-19
any investigation of any kind into the facts of the case, but relied on the Sheriff Office’s reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5381 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly S. Skavlen
to sheriffs to “place in the home detention program any person confined in jail who has been … sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12534 - 2017-09-21
to sheriffs to “place in the home detention program any person confined in jail who has been … sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12534 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Nuttleman
hearing, Deputy William Ottoway of the Iowa County Sheriff’s Department testified that on October 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21
hearing, Deputy William Ottoway of the Iowa County Sheriff’s Department testified that on October 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21