Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1771 - 1780 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Nikolas J. Tries
a judgment entered by the trial court convicting him of one count of disorderly conduct. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15784 - 2017-09-21
a judgment entered by the trial court convicting him of one count of disorderly conduct. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15784 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ventae Parrow
facts that entitled him to relief and that the trial court erred when it refused to hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14988 - 2005-03-31
facts that entitled him to relief and that the trial court erred when it refused to hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14988 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nikolas J. Tries
FINE, J. Nikolas J. Tries appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court convicting him of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15784 - 2005-03-31
FINE, J. Nikolas J. Tries appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court convicting him of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15784 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ventae Parrow
facts that entitled him to relief and that the trial court erred when it refused to hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
facts that entitled him to relief and that the trial court erred when it refused to hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Haug
for postconviction relief. He argues that a new trial in the interest of justice should be granted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10018 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief. He argues that a new trial in the interest of justice should be granted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10018 - 2017-09-19
State v. Keyun Utsey
. Utsey claims the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by: (1) relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26
. Utsey claims the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by: (1) relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26
State v. Kenneth Haug
and incest, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10018 - 2005-03-31
and incest, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10018 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to deliver cocaine. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33761 - 2008-08-18
to deliver cocaine. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33761 - 2008-08-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
and for attempting to deliver cocaine. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33761 - 2014-09-15
and for attempting to deliver cocaine. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33761 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel when trial counsel failed to: (1) object to defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21
to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel when trial counsel failed to: (1) object to defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21