Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17711 - 17720 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17711 - 17720 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
material facts entitling the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447887 - 2021-11-02
material facts entitling the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447887 - 2021-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Brown, 276 Wis. 2d 559, ¶5. ¶8 We begin our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Brown, 276 Wis. 2d 559, ¶5. ¶8 We begin our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher E. Betow
statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14443 - 2011-03-31
statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14443 - 2011-03-31
Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
independently on appeal.” Thus, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2011-03-31
independently on appeal.” Thus, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2011-03-31
Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42388 - 2009-10-19
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42388 - 2009-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
things. Meis filed a motion for a de novo hearing, claiming “[t]he competency of the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2009-02-19
things. Meis filed a motion for a de novo hearing, claiming “[t]he competency of the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2009-02-19
Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 442, 468 N.W.2d at 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11517 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 442, 468 N.W.2d at 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11517 - 2005-03-31