Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17711 - 17720 of 29828 for des.
Search results 17711 - 17720 of 29828 for des.
Susan Czapinski v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.
that is reviewed de novo. Burks v. St. Joseph's Hosp., 227 Wis. 2d 811, 824, 596 N.W.2d 391 (1999). Likewise
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17425 - 2005-03-31
that is reviewed de novo. Burks v. St. Joseph's Hosp., 227 Wis. 2d 811, 824, 596 N.W.2d 391 (1999). Likewise
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17425 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard Dodson
of constitutional proportion and, as such, involves constitutional facts which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10793 - 2017-09-20
of constitutional proportion and, as such, involves constitutional facts which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10793 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Carter, 2010 WI 40, ¶19, 324 Wis. 2d 640, 782
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192505 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Carter, 2010 WI 40, ¶19, 324 Wis. 2d 640, 782
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192505 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dawn Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
. Civ. P.] 60(b)(6).'" Schwochert, 166 Wis. 2d at 102 (quoting De
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18668 - 2017-09-21
. Civ. P.] 60(b)(6).'" Schwochert, 166 Wis. 2d at 102 (quoting De
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18668 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas E. Eckert
performance was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9330 - 2005-03-31
performance was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9330 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct. App. 1998). We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010283 - 2025-09-18
. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct. App. 1998). We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010283 - 2025-09-18
Lori Hofflander v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.
The review of a summary judgment motion is a question of law that we consider de novo. Jankee, 2000 WI 64
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3014 - 2005-03-31
The review of a summary judgment motion is a question of law that we consider de novo. Jankee, 2000 WI 64
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Ruby Washington
, our review is de novo. See Rebernick v. Wausau Gen. Ins. Co., 2005 WI App 15, ¶5, 278 Wis. 2d 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24633 - 2017-09-21
, our review is de novo. See Rebernick v. Wausau Gen. Ins. Co., 2005 WI App 15, ¶5, 278 Wis. 2d 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eternalist Foundation, Inc. v. City of Platteville
motion was timely, and because our review is de novo, any errors the trial court may have committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14232 - 2014-09-15
motion was timely, and because our review is de novo, any errors the trial court may have committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14232 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo, without deference to the [trial] court’s determination.” Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120932 - 2014-09-02
of law, which we review de novo, without deference to the [trial] court’s determination.” Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120932 - 2014-09-02