Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17721 - 17730 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17721 - 17730 of 29942 for des.
2009 WI APP 172
facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42674 - 2009-11-23
facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42674 - 2009-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2013-09-10
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2013-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46417 - 2013-01-27
this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46417 - 2013-01-27
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2007-03-15
of law which this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2007-03-15
Westel - Milwaukee Company, Inc. v. Walworth County
the County to examine the record de novo and permit Cellular One to introduce its evidence regarding other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2007-10-07
the County to examine the record de novo and permit Cellular One to introduce its evidence regarding other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2007-10-07
Donald Murtaugh v. State
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2009-09-08
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2009-09-08
John W. Ernst, v. Berndt Buick Company
is satisfied. The construction of a statute presents a question of law. De Bruin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8786 - 2009-09-08
is satisfied. The construction of a statute presents a question of law. De Bruin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8786 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
2008 WI APP 149
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2005-03-31
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54241 - 2010-09-08
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54241 - 2010-09-08