Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17721 - 17730 of 68566 for did.

[PDF] State v. Henry L. Williams
and Williams answered yes, and also stated in response to the court’s question that he did not have any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3154 - 2017-09-19

State v. Johnny L. Hampton
” and did not “infect the trial with unfairness.” Counsel is allowed considerable latitude in closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12124 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mellissa Jacobson
the technician was ready to draw the blood, Jacobson continued to yell at Olson, but she did extend her arm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21486 - 2006-02-21

State v. Larry Luckett
felt pain in his mouth area. Finnigan further stated that Luckett did not demand anything or say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12593 - 2005-03-31

Portage County Department of Human Services v. Rebecca E.
and three separate fathers. Becky did not appear. Apparently there had been a plan to have her appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3387 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 8, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. The State did not do so. State was not required to do so.” ¶6 On the date scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20174 - 2007-01-24

State v. Brian A. Patterson
At his jury trial, Patterson did not dispute that his driving privilege had been revoked; the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31

Dorothy Caraher v. City of Menomonie
that this presented a hazard, especially at night, he did nothing to alleviate the dangerous condition. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4491 - 2005-03-31

Stanley Slaven v. Janice L. Graeber
, but because the court did not have any information concerning costs and attorneys’ fees, it adjourned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13593 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it dismissed their action. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239787 - 2019-05-01