Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17731 - 17740 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] WI App 62
by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249452 - 2020-02-05

[PDF] State v. Edwin J. Street
are not disputed, whether the facts establish a constitutional violation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9521 - 2017-09-19

State v. Thomas E. Eckert
performance was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9330 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct. App. 1998). We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010283 - 2025-09-18

Lori Hofflander v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.
The review of a summary judgment motion is a question of law that we consider de novo. Jankee, 2000 WI 64
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3014 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
could have placement when he was off work on a non-school day which is his placement day. On de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56805 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Milwaukee v. Ruby Washington
, our review is de novo. See Rebernick v. Wausau Gen. Ins. Co., 2005 WI App 15, ¶5, 278 Wis. 2d 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24633 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Gary Richards v. First Union Securities, Inc.
, and therefore are questions of law which an appellate court reviews de novo. Useni v. Boudron, 2003 WI App 98
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25324 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Eternalist Foundation, Inc. v. City of Platteville
motion was timely, and because our review is de novo, any errors the trial court may have committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14232 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo, without deference to the [trial] court’s determination.” Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120932 - 2014-09-02