Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17751 - 17760 of 46129 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Duane E. Elm
are reviewed under the two‑pronged test set out by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peggy A. Hampton
sobriety tests given 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ronald Frank
of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Wisconsin employs the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17640 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
“new” DNA testing in his original postconviction motion. We No. 2005AP1255 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28209 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Duane E. Elm
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are reviewed under the two-pronged test set out by the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
in six respects, and for failing to seek “new” DNA testing in his original postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28209 - 2007-02-26

State v. Daryl G. Hoffmann
right to due process was violated when the State failed to preserve a vehicle for testing, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8054 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Supreme Court rule 1609 supporting memo
are considered “foreign nations” in Wisconsin, thus any legal work conducted for a Native American Tribe
/supreme/docs/1609memo.pdf - 2016-11-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
could not appear because he was out of town working. The circuit court denied Ardell’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93994 - 2014-09-15

Amsoil, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that the knee injury was work related) to decide that Amsoil's refusal to rehire Andren was unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10104 - 2005-03-31