Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17761 - 17770 of 64273 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
Search results 17761 - 17770 of 64273 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
Frontsheet
, and conducted an evidentiary reinstatement hearing on November 3, 2011. The evidence presented included medical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84684 - 2012-07-09
, and conducted an evidentiary reinstatement hearing on November 3, 2011. The evidence presented included medical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84684 - 2012-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2020 arrest for possession of child pornography. According to the revocation order, Joers possessed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
2020 arrest for possession of child pornography. According to the revocation order, Joers possessed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
only when he found himself on a dead-end street. Seventeen-year-old Newman was arrested. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238671 - 2019-04-10
only when he found himself on a dead-end street. Seventeen-year-old Newman was arrested. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238671 - 2019-04-10
[PDF]
State v. Andre L. Lee
brought out that Singleton was arrested and gave a statement to police many months before that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6741 - 2017-09-20
brought out that Singleton was arrested and gave a statement to police many months before that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6741 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his suppression motion without a hearing. We conclude that Marsh was not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
in denying his suppression motion without a hearing. We conclude that Marsh was not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
State v. Kenneth Moffett
counsel, and that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We reject his arguments and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5200 - 2005-03-31
counsel, and that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We reject his arguments and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for refusing to provide a requested breath sample following her arrest and convicting her of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
for refusing to provide a requested breath sample following her arrest and convicting her of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mary H.
the fact-finding hearing, the jury determined that only Mary had not demonstrated substantial progress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2183 - 2017-09-19
the fact-finding hearing, the jury determined that only Mary had not demonstrated substantial progress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mary H.
the fact-finding hearing, the jury determined that only Mary had not demonstrated substantial progress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2184 - 2017-09-19
the fact-finding hearing, the jury determined that only Mary had not demonstrated substantial progress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2184 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mary H.
to their four children; however, after the fact-finding hearing, the jury determined that only Mary had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2184 - 2005-03-31
to their four children; however, after the fact-finding hearing, the jury determined that only Mary had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2184 - 2005-03-31