Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17761 - 17770 of 65156 for or b.
Search results 17761 - 17770 of 65156 for or b.
State v. Dale J. Lemke
(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3672 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3672 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
duty to issue an award. Their argument is based on statutes, mainly Wis. Stat. § 32.08(6)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
duty to issue an award. Their argument is based on statutes, mainly Wis. Stat. § 32.08(6)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
State v. Barry Bartle
, we affirm. Bartle was charged with interfering with the custody of a child, contrary to § 948.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
, we affirm. Bartle was charged with interfering with the custody of a child, contrary to § 948.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
Peters & Vanden Heuvel v. Richard Vanden Heuvel
. On May 2, 1997, the court notified the parties that “[b]ecause of any confusion regarding the signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
. On May 2, 1997, the court notified the parties that “[b]ecause of any confusion regarding the signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Pence v. M&I Central State Bank
neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3); (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5086 - 2017-09-19
neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3); (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5086 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Morgan V.
potential for responding to future treatment. (b) The type and seriousness of the offense, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14755 - 2017-09-21
potential for responding to future treatment. (b) The type and seriousness of the offense, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tracy A. Kiefer
, pursuant to § 343.305(10)(b)2, STATS., for refusing to submit to a breath test. Kiefer argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10776 - 2017-09-20
, pursuant to § 343.305(10)(b)2, STATS., for refusing to submit to a breath test. Kiefer argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10776 - 2017-09-20
State v. Craig Chenal
for misdemeanor theft, party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.20(1)(a) and 939.05(2)(b). The State
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3746 - 2005-03-31
for misdemeanor theft, party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.20(1)(a) and 939.05(2)(b). The State
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b). The State’s reliance upon Popke is thus misplaced. ¶11 The dispositive question before me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123499 - 2017-09-21
)(b). The State’s reliance upon Popke is thus misplaced. ¶11 The dispositive question before me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles A. Poindexter II v. Pamela J. Kagan
. § 767.325(1)(b). The trial court may therefore provide remedies other than those specifically requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21
. § 767.325(1)(b). The trial court may therefore provide remedies other than those specifically requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21