Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17781 - 17790 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 17781 - 17790 of 58507 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
following a jury trial for one count of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654489 - 2023-05-09
following a jury trial for one count of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654489 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
Minerva Riley v. Russell K. Lawson, M.D.
. This consolidated appeal arises from a medical malpractice bench trial. The initial appeal stems from two orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10386 - 2017-09-20
. This consolidated appeal arises from a medical malpractice bench trial. The initial appeal stems from two orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10386 - 2017-09-20
State v. Corina D.
parental rights. She also argues that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of Corina’s lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7654 - 2005-03-31
parental rights. She also argues that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of Corina’s lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Corina D.
that there were grounds to terminate her parental rights. She also argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7654 - 2017-09-19
that there were grounds to terminate her parental rights. She also argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7654 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 Dr. Martens performed a bilateral cauterization of Marla’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33953 - 2014-09-15
trial. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 Dr. Martens performed a bilateral cauterization of Marla’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33953 - 2014-09-15
State v. Maurice E. O'Neal
was invalid. We affirm the trial court order. Background ¶2 The facts underlying the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
was invalid. We affirm the trial court order. Background ¶2 The facts underlying the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postdisposition relief. Kenneth argues his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103098 - 2017-09-21
for postdisposition relief. Kenneth argues his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103098 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 178
for postconviction relief.[1] This was his second trial on the charge. The first ended in a mistrial. Haywood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43863 - 2009-12-15
for postconviction relief.[1] This was his second trial on the charge. The first ended in a mistrial. Haywood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43863 - 2009-12-15
[PDF]
WI App 31
that the trial court erred when it: No. 2007AP736 2 (1) failed to properly interpret and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31477 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred when it: No. 2007AP736 2 (1) failed to properly interpret and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31477 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Celeste T. Malovrh v. Joseph J. Malovrh
. Joseph argues the record fails to support the trial court’s finding with respect to his No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4600 - 2017-09-19
. Joseph argues the record fails to support the trial court’s finding with respect to his No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4600 - 2017-09-19