Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17791 - 17800 of 64205 for records.
Search results 17791 - 17800 of 64205 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218808 - 2018-09-12
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218808 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Alphonso Miller
—that the judge was anti-defendant—the supreme court examined the record to determine whether Carprue’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17945 - 2017-09-21
—that the judge was anti-defendant—the supreme court examined the record to determine whether Carprue’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17945 - 2017-09-21
Bernard L. Beyer v. Stephen M. Puckett
and, by extension, the record before us, does not contain Puckett’s May 7 decision because it was made after Beyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3573 - 2005-03-31
and, by extension, the record before us, does not contain Puckett’s May 7 decision because it was made after Beyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3573 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117139 - 2026-05-13
file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117139 - 2026-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192226 - 2017-09-21
of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113660 - 2017-09-21
2 reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113660 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471348 - 2022-01-13
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471348 - 2022-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of the prison record, but “there is nothing substantive to correct.” ¶6 On appeal, Stanton’s opening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
of the prison record, but “there is nothing substantive to correct.” ¶6 On appeal, Stanton’s opening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
State v. Martin T. Bauknecht
for it in the record. See Elias v. State, 93 Wis. 2d 278, 281-82, 286 N.W.2d 559 (1980). A strong policy exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4115 - 2005-03-31
for it in the record. See Elias v. State, 93 Wis. 2d 278, 281-82, 286 N.W.2d 559 (1980). A strong policy exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4115 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211797 - 2018-04-25
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211797 - 2018-04-25