Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 45230 for Cost-effective.

[PDF] WI 11
it appropriate to require Attorney Wood pay the full costs of the proceeding, which were $19,959.24
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92088 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
Vaitys shall pay the costs of this proceeding, which are $4,703.85 as of July 10, 2019. ¶3 Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245557 - 2019-08-28

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
that there was no evidence to support a verdict in excess of $109,000, the only estimate of the cost of the pool replacement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58003 - 2010-12-20

Frontsheet
to practice law, and we deem it appropriate to require Attorney Wood pay the full costs of the proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92088 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
to the most efficient, fair, and cost-effective treatment available in the court system. My vision
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539791 - 2022-06-29

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
to the most efficient, fair, and cost-effective treatment available in the court system. My vision
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539791 - 2022-06-29

[PDF] Frontsheet
. Failure to furnish the notice within 20 days of the effective date of the order or judgment of the other
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709951 - 2023-10-03

[PDF] High Tech Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Michael A. O'Connell
. The counterclaim in question sought double damages, costs and fees under § 100.20(5), STATS., for High Tech's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10474 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hans K. Ribbens
with respect to restitution and costs. Attorney Ribbens did not file any response and we deem he has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16778 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hans K. Ribbens
this court should not approve the OLR’s revised recommendations with respect to restitution and costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16778 - 2005-03-31