Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 50820 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 50820 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
COURT OF APPEALS
all evidence obtained after he was stopped for speeding. Glover argues that the officer: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61685 - 2011-03-23
all evidence obtained after he was stopped for speeding. Glover argues that the officer: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61685 - 2011-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
after he was stopped for speeding. Glover argues that the officer: (1) illegally expanded the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61685 - 2014-09-15
after he was stopped for speeding. Glover argues that the officer: (1) illegally expanded the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61685 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the arresting police officer. The officer testified that he placed Opelt under arrest for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106102 - 2013-12-26
, the arresting police officer. The officer testified that he placed Opelt under arrest for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106102 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the arresting police officer. The officer testified that he placed Opelt under arrest for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106102 - 2017-09-21
, the arresting police officer. The officer testified that he placed Opelt under arrest for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106102 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
was the result of an unlawful detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
was the result of an unlawful detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required for a lawful detention, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3494 - 2017-09-19
detention. We conclude the officer had the reasonable suspicion required for a lawful detention, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3494 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jill A. Moore
appeals an order vacating Jill Moore’s judgment of conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7218 - 2017-09-20
appeals an order vacating Jill Moore’s judgment of conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7218 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
on Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (2015), held that the officer unlawfully extended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239975 - 2019-04-30
on Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (2015), held that the officer unlawfully extended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239975 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
. I disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 In March 2009, a police officer was dispatched to a private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57605 - 2014-09-15
. I disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 In March 2009, a police officer was dispatched to a private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57605 - 2014-09-15
State v. Leandro Arechederra III
of the refusal hearing. That exception is Officer Sweeney’s assertion that Arechederra’s speech was slurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3681 - 2005-03-31
of the refusal hearing. That exception is Officer Sweeney’s assertion that Arechederra’s speech was slurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3681 - 2005-03-31