Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 69135 for as he.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 69135 for as he.
State v. Paul I. Ekblad
for postconviction relief. Ekblad argues that we should vacate his judgment of conviction because (1) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4507 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. Ekblad argues that we should vacate his judgment of conviction because (1) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4507 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul I. Ekblad
because (1) he was denied his right to counsel, (2) he was not indicted by a grand jury, (3) § 943.60
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4507 - 2017-09-19
because (1) he was denied his right to counsel, (2) he was not indicted by a grand jury, (3) § 943.60
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4507 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
hearing. Kastenschmidt testified that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56617 - 2014-09-15
hearing. Kastenschmidt testified that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because he mistakenly believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because he mistakenly believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail on Highway 41 with another officer, Deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56617 - 2010-11-16
that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail on Highway 41 with another officer, Deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56617 - 2010-11-16
State v. Daniel W. Harr
in which he was adjudged not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI). He argues that (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11505 - 2005-03-31
in which he was adjudged not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI). He argues that (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Harr
Institution (Mendota), which resulted from an unrelated criminal case in which he was adjudged not guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11505 - 2017-09-19
Institution (Mendota), which resulted from an unrelated criminal case in which he was adjudged not guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11505 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the consequences of his plea, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131518 - 2017-09-21
the consequences of his plea, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Antwan D. Robinson
no contest plea. He contends that the trial court failed during the plea colloquy to personally advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21138 - 2017-09-21
no contest plea. He contends that the trial court failed during the plea colloquy to personally advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21138 - 2017-09-21
State v. George F. Passarelli
)(a), Stats., and a judgment convicting him of one count of battery and one count of disorderly conduct. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13818 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats., and a judgment convicting him of one count of battery and one count of disorderly conduct. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13818 - 2005-03-31