Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 69869 for his.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 69869 for his.
State v. Donald J. Buford
denying his postconviction motion. Buford claims: (1) he did not knowingly waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. Buford claims: (1) he did not knowingly waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
State v. Royce Minnich
court’s denial of postconviction relief. On appeal, Minnich argues that his trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13668 - 2005-03-31
court’s denial of postconviction relief. On appeal, Minnich argues that his trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas B.M.
of the circuit court removing his son, Jonathan S., from his home, which the circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13767 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court removing his son, Jonathan S., from his home, which the circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13767 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction entered following the revocation of his probation and from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219506 - 2018-09-26
of conviction entered following the revocation of his probation and from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219506 - 2018-09-26
State v. Robert E. Tucker
PER CURIAM. Robert E. Tucker appeals from an order summarily denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25563 - 2006-06-22
PER CURIAM. Robert E. Tucker appeals from an order summarily denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25563 - 2006-06-22
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
the disciplinary proceeding. We reject his arguments and affirm. No. 01-1276 2 ¶2 In June 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3952 - 2017-09-20
the disciplinary proceeding. We reject his arguments and affirm. No. 01-1276 2 ¶2 In June 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3952 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Tucker
his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are whether Tucker’s appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25563 - 2017-09-21
his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are whether Tucker’s appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Garrity
, 161.41(1x), and 939.31, STATS., 1991-92, and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9397 - 2017-09-19
, 161.41(1x), and 939.31, STATS., 1991-92, and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9397 - 2017-09-19
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 In June 1998, approximately 250 inmates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3952 - 2005-03-31
. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 In June 1998, approximately 250 inmates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3952 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
as a subsequent offense. We conclude that McDaniel’s reaching with his right hand around to the small of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31785 - 2014-09-15
as a subsequent offense. We conclude that McDaniel’s reaching with his right hand around to the small of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31785 - 2014-09-15