Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 59303 for quit claim deed.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 59303 for quit claim deed.
2011 WI APP 29
provides: (4) Substandard Lots Lots of record in the Register Of Deeds office on January 1, 1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60057 - 2011-03-29
provides: (4) Substandard Lots Lots of record in the Register Of Deeds office on January 1, 1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60057 - 2011-03-29
[PDF]
WI APP 29
). The ordinance provides: (4) SUBSTANDARD LOTS Lots of record in the Register Of Deeds office on January 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60057 - 2014-09-15
). The ordinance provides: (4) SUBSTANDARD LOTS Lots of record in the Register Of Deeds office on January 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60057 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gaspar S. Montoya
which Montoya claimed contained the previous victim’s underpants. A police officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16253 - 2017-09-21
which Montoya claimed contained the previous victim’s underpants. A police officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any No. 2009AP2315 3 removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15
not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any No. 2009AP2315 3 removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 135
, but the deed reflects an easement across Kosir’s property. Spencer only knew of the lot being visited twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
, but the deed reflects an easement across Kosir’s property. Spencer only knew of the lot being visited twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in dispute. In August 2002, DOT acquired by deed property belonging to the Meises for a road project.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
are not in dispute. In August 2002, DOT acquired by deed property belonging to the Meises for a road project.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
not in the right-of-way and could not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27
not in the right-of-way and could not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27
Robert J. Ollman v. Scott H. Pecor
of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating that in July 2002 he gave notice of his intent to exercise an option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25098 - 2006-05-09
of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating that in July 2002 he gave notice of his intent to exercise an option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25098 - 2006-05-09
2007 WI APP 135
to either property. Spencer’s property does not have access to the town road, but the deed reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28578 - 2007-07-11
to either property. Spencer’s property does not have access to the town road, but the deed reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28578 - 2007-07-11
Fred Brown v. Friends of Mazo Beach
for failure to state a claim de novo. See Town of Eagle v. Christensen, 191 Wis. 2d 301, 311-12, 529 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15156 - 2005-03-31
for failure to state a claim de novo. See Town of Eagle v. Christensen, 191 Wis. 2d 301, 311-12, 529 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15156 - 2005-03-31