Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 58969 for quit claim deed.
Search results 1781 - 1790 of 58969 for quit claim deed.
Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
PER CURIAM. Curt and Dorothy Wenzel appeal from an order dismissing their personal injury claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Curt and Dorothy Wenzel appeal from an order dismissing their personal injury claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
PER CURIAM. Curt and Dorothy Wenzel appeal from an order dismissing their personal injury claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4331 - 2017-09-19
PER CURIAM. Curt and Dorothy Wenzel appeal from an order dismissing their personal injury claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4331 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Socha concedes that a copy of the transcript was provided. However, Socha also claims a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96290 - 2014-09-15
.” Socha concedes that a copy of the transcript was provided. However, Socha also claims a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96290 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the transcript was provided. However, Socha also claims a request for Oberlin’s handwritten statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96290 - 2013-05-06
of the transcript was provided. However, Socha also claims a request for Oberlin’s handwritten statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96290 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Gaspar S. Montoya
which Montoya claimed contained the previous victim’s underpants. A police officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16253 - 2017-09-21
which Montoya claimed contained the previous victim’s underpants. A police officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16253 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in dispute. In August 2002, DOT acquired by deed property belonging to the Meises for a road project.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
are not in dispute. In August 2002, DOT acquired by deed property belonging to the Meises for a road project.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
not in the right-of-way and could not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27
not in the right-of-way and could not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27
Robert J. Ollman v. Scott H. Pecor
of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating that in July 2002 he gave notice of his intent to exercise an option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25098 - 2006-05-09
of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating that in July 2002 he gave notice of his intent to exercise an option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25098 - 2006-05-09
[PDF]
WI APP 135
, but the deed reflects an easement across Kosir’s property. Spencer only knew of the lot being visited twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
, but the deed reflects an easement across Kosir’s property. Spencer only knew of the lot being visited twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any No. 2009AP2315 3 removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15
not be removed. The Affeldts claimed that any No. 2009AP2315 3 removal, cutting, damaging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15