Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17801 - 17810 of 29713 for des.
Search results 17801 - 17810 of 29713 for des.
Kennneth W. Dicks v. Employe Trust Funds Board
Wis.2d 35, 40, 449 N.W.2d 268, 270 (1990). We review the agency's decision de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9214 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 35, 40, 449 N.W.2d 268, 270 (1990). We review the agency's decision de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9214 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard W. Foelker
. The application of the implied consent law to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9540 - 2005-03-31
. The application of the implied consent law to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9540 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6, 258 Wis. 2d 796, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79020 - 2012-03-05
is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6, 258 Wis. 2d 796, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79020 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Travis Allen
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas J. Otto v. Milwaukee County
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting promissory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting promissory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
will be affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58034 - 2010-12-20
will be affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58034 - 2010-12-20
State v. Fontaine L. Baker
de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19095 - 2005-07-25
de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19095 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Id. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239472 - 2019-04-24
de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Id. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239472 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Counsel’s performance is “constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74183 - 2014-09-15
reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Counsel’s performance is “constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74183 - 2014-09-15
Thomas J. Justmann v. Portage County
interpretation de novo. State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105, ¶5, 254 Wis. 2d 868, 648 N.W.2d 496. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7124 - 2005-03-31
interpretation de novo. State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105, ¶5, 254 Wis. 2d 868, 648 N.W.2d 496. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7124 - 2005-03-31