Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17801 - 17810 of 58326 for speedy trial.
Search results 17801 - 17810 of 58326 for speedy trial.
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
[PDF]
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael F. Howard
of trial counsel when counsel failed to object to the State’s breach. We conclude that the State breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
of trial counsel when counsel failed to object to the State’s breach. We conclude that the State breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2021AP1100 2 trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of the in-court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541975 - 2022-07-12
. No. 2021AP1100 2 trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of the in-court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541975 - 2022-07-12
[PDF]
Daniel Williams v. Alan Rogers
against it. It also appeals the results of a bench trial contained within the action. In particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8382 - 2017-09-19
against it. It also appeals the results of a bench trial contained within the action. In particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8382 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tronnie M. Dismuke
. Dismuke argues that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay fees and travel costs generated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15709 - 2005-03-31
. Dismuke argues that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay fees and travel costs generated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tronnie M. Dismuke
for reconsideration. Dismuke argues that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay fees and travel costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15709 - 2017-09-21
for reconsideration. Dismuke argues that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay fees and travel costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2008
interference with a contract. The trial court held that LaBudde was liable for intentionally aiding
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34753 - 2014-09-15
interference with a contract. The trial court held that LaBudde was liable for intentionally aiding
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34753 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ricky D. Loret
., following a jury trial. Loret raises two arguments on appeal. First, he claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14995 - 2017-09-21
., following a jury trial. Loret raises two arguments on appeal. First, he claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14995 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Williams v. Alan Rogers
of a partial summary judgment against it. It also appeals the results of a bench trial contained within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8382 - 2005-03-31
of a partial summary judgment against it. It also appeals the results of a bench trial contained within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8382 - 2005-03-31