Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17811 - 17820 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17811 - 17820 of 29823 for des.
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
decide the issue de novo, giving no deference to the decision of the Tax Appeals Commission. American
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17246 - 2008-04-30
decide the issue de novo, giving no deference to the decision of the Tax Appeals Commission. American
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17246 - 2008-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶38-39. We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780839 - 2024-03-26
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶38-39. We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780839 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
WI App 138
requires us to interpret WIS. STAT. ch. 32, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54399 - 2014-09-15
requires us to interpret WIS. STAT. ch. 32, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54399 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rache M.
subject to de novo review. State v. Kiper, 193 Wis.2d 69, 79-80, 532 N.W.2d 698, 703 (1995) (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8947 - 2005-03-31
subject to de novo review. State v. Kiper, 193 Wis.2d 69, 79-80, 532 N.W.2d 698, 703 (1995) (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8947 - 2005-03-31
Maurice Eleby v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
to the agency conclusion: “great weight,” “due weight” or “de novo.” Id. In Knight, we set out what these three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14048 - 2005-03-31
to the agency conclusion: “great weight,” “due weight” or “de novo.” Id. In Knight, we set out what these three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14048 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 980.01(5). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Martel, 2003 WI 70, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38604 - 2009-07-29
. § 980.01(5). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Martel, 2003 WI 70, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38604 - 2009-07-29
[PDF]
WI APP 80
de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83925 - 2014-09-15
de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83925 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This court reviews the interpretation of ordinances de novo and applies the same interpretation rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190944 - 2017-09-21
. This court reviews the interpretation of ordinances de novo and applies the same interpretation rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Maurice Eleby v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
” or “de novo.” Id. In Knight, we set out what these three standards entail and when they are applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14048 - 2014-09-15
” or “de novo.” Id. In Knight, we set out what these three standards entail and when they are applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14048 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ralph Schmidt v. Northern States Power Company
this action. We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26597 - 2017-09-21
this action. We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26597 - 2017-09-21