Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17811 - 17820 of 64205 for records.
Search results 17811 - 17820 of 64205 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143688 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143688 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96748 - 2014-09-15
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236320 - 2019-03-06
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236320 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219597 - 2018-09-26
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219597 - 2018-09-26
State v. Timothy J. Johnson
Johnson. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11304 - 2005-03-31
Johnson. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289457 - 2020-09-22
of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289457 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
not filed a response. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
U.S. 738 (1967). P.L.C.-B. filed multiple responses. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599016 - 2022-12-14
U.S. 738 (1967). P.L.C.-B. filed multiple responses. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599016 - 2022-12-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049954 - 2025-12-16
record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049954 - 2025-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04