Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17811 - 17820 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] NOTICE
verdict, on one count of first-degree intentional homicide. Wakeman asserts multiple trial court errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33718 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for an evidentiary hearing on his motion for plea withdrawal. Additionally, Moffett argues trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=394037 - 2021-07-20

State v. Maurice L. Floyd
offered to take a polygraph or, alternatively, his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 140
assistance of counsel at trial and that the court’s evidentiary ruling on other acts evidence was error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33785 - 2014-09-15

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
are defective, and we thus set aside the appealed orders and remand for a new trial. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15827 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
are defective, and we thus set aside the appealed orders and remand for a new trial. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15829 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Cobb
. No. 94-3440-CR -2- The State concedes that Cobb was denied a jury trial on all the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8453 - 2017-09-19

State v. Charles A. Hoffman
a trial court order that denied his § 974.06, Stats., motion challenging his 1991 conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11501 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael Donskey v. Linda Donskey
is whether the trial court applied the proper legal standard when it ruled on the motion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8938 - 2017-09-19

Michael Donskey v. Linda Donskey
judgment. The issue is whether the trial court applied the proper legal standard when it ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8938 - 2005-03-31