Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17821 - 17830 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17821 - 17830 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Emmett White
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10472 - 2017-09-20
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10472 - 2017-09-20
State v. Pedro P. Avila
of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. However, we review de novo constitutional facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8626 - 2005-03-31
of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. However, we review de novo constitutional facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8626 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Lettice
we review de novo. State v. Kramsvogel, 124 Wis.2d 101, 107, 369 N.W.2d 145, 147-48 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13425 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. State v. Kramsvogel, 124 Wis.2d 101, 107, 369 N.W.2d 145, 147-48 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13425 - 2017-09-21
American Standard Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
decide the issue de novo, giving no deference to the decision of the Tax Appeals Commission. American
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17247 - 2005-03-31
decide the issue de novo, giving no deference to the decision of the Tax Appeals Commission. American
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17247 - 2005-03-31
Gary G. Gojmerac v. James R. Mahn
west, where it was to terminate in a cul‑de‑sac. Block One, west and south of the public road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3767 - 2005-03-31
west, where it was to terminate in a cul‑de‑sac. Block One, west and south of the public road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3767 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Insurance Security Fund v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of this case. We agree.[7] ¶29 The parties correctly note that our review is de novo. We do not accord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19983 - 2005-12-11
of this case. We agree.[7] ¶29 The parties correctly note that our review is de novo. We do not accord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19983 - 2005-12-11
Julie L. Rabideau v. City of Racine
judgment to the City.[7] This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Strasser v. Transtech
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17581 - 2005-03-31
judgment to the City.[7] This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Strasser v. Transtech
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dale Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
of Lawrence & Des Rochers, S.C., of St. Nazianz. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7819 - 2017-09-19
of Lawrence & Des Rochers, S.C., of St. Nazianz. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7819 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Ottman, 332 Wis. 2d 3, ¶54. ¶24 In this case, Sandoval argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488149 - 2022-02-24
we review de novo. Ottman, 332 Wis. 2d 3, ¶54. ¶24 In this case, Sandoval argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488149 - 2022-02-24
2007 WI App 191
Wis. 2d 428, 701 N.W.2d 626. Our review on this issue is de novo as it involves a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29864 - 2007-08-27
Wis. 2d 428, 701 N.W.2d 626. Our review on this issue is de novo as it involves a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29864 - 2007-08-27