Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17821 - 17830 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17821 - 17830 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Whether the partiality of a trial court can be questioned is a matter of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49634 - 2014-09-15
. Whether the partiality of a trial court can be questioned is a matter of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49634 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is an issue implicating the defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial and is therefore reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517577 - 2022-05-11
is an issue implicating the defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial and is therefore reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517577 - 2022-05-11
[PDF]
State v. David Wilson
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12456 - 2017-09-21
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12456 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We determine de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689320 - 2023-08-15
. We determine de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689320 - 2023-08-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Martel, 2003 WI 70, ¶8, 262 Wis. 2d 483
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38604 - 2014-09-15
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Martel, 2003 WI 70, ¶8, 262 Wis. 2d 483
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38604 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 102
were correct as a matter of law. See WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52688 - 2014-09-15
were correct as a matter of law. See WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52688 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Lange
has established a prima facie case for plea withdrawal presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4420 - 2017-09-19
has established a prima facie case for plea withdrawal presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4420 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
E. C. Styberg Engineering Company, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
weight deference is inappropriate and in favor of de novo review: Honthaners Rests., Inc. v. LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7464 - 2017-09-20
weight deference is inappropriate and in favor of de novo review: Honthaners Rests., Inc. v. LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7464 - 2017-09-20
Roger Maahs v. Louis B. Liebfried, Jr.
the evidence de novo but we apply the same methodology as the trial court applies when considering motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12063 - 2005-03-31
the evidence de novo but we apply the same methodology as the trial court applies when considering motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeramey J. Byrge
that we should apply a de novo standard. He relies on Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson’s concurring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13229 - 2017-09-21
that we should apply a de novo standard. He relies on Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson’s concurring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13229 - 2017-09-21