Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17821 - 17830 of 58511 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
pseudonyms instead of the family’s initials. No. 2021AP2163-CRNM 3 the trial court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806615 - 2024-05-29

[PDF] NOTICE
verdict, on one count of first-degree intentional homicide. Wakeman asserts multiple trial court errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33718 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for an evidentiary hearing on his motion for plea withdrawal. Additionally, Moffett argues trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=394037 - 2021-07-20

[PDF] Economy Preferred Insurance Company v. Edward A. Solner and George D. Solner
in Flynn v. Solner, No. 90-CV-3567 (Dane Cty. Cir. Ct. 1992). This action was dismissed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9272 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 140
assistance of counsel at trial and that the court’s evidentiary ruling on other acts evidence was error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33785 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
and remand for a new trial. We also conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15829 - 2017-09-21

State v. Maurice L. Floyd
offered to take a polygraph or, alternatively, his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7419 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
are defective, and we thus set aside the appealed orders and remand for a new trial. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15828 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
are defective, and we thus set aside the appealed orders and remand for a new trial. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15827 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
are defective, and we thus set aside the appealed orders and remand for a new trial. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15826 - 2005-03-31