Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17831 - 17840 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
Search results 17831 - 17840 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
Melissa Ertz Rogge v. Paul Aaron Rogge
a post-divorce order requiring him to pay one-half of his son Barrett’s daycare expenses. Paul claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
a post-divorce order requiring him to pay one-half of his son Barrett’s daycare expenses. Paul claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
result of the alleged mold defects, Armament claims damages from loss of use and diminution in value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12563 - 2017-09-21
result of the alleged mold defects, Armament claims damages from loss of use and diminution in value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12563 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
later added claims against Swedish Match and Ace. ¶6 State Auto and Ace both sought declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52000 - 2010-07-12
later added claims against Swedish Match and Ace. ¶6 State Auto and Ace both sought declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52000 - 2010-07-12
Iron County v. Ryszard Borys
and Zbigniew Supinski appeal a judgment concluding that a strip of land they claim to own is a public road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16343 - 2005-03-31
and Zbigniew Supinski appeal a judgment concluding that a strip of land they claim to own is a public road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16343 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the constitutionality of marijuana possession laws. In the circuit court, Driessen filed a “Notice of Claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61402 - 2011-03-21
to the constitutionality of marijuana possession laws. In the circuit court, Driessen filed a “Notice of Claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61402 - 2011-03-21
CA Blank Order
535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The report next addresses Lubbert’s claim to appellate counsel that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137860 - 2015-03-24
535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The report next addresses Lubbert’s claim to appellate counsel that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137860 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rejected the claim as an untimely effort to challenge the exercise of sentencing discretion. Lindsey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19
rejected the claim as an untimely effort to challenge the exercise of sentencing discretion. Lindsey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19
CA Blank Order
Carrie S.’s parental rights, and (3) whether the record supports any claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106830 - 2014-01-21
Carrie S.’s parental rights, and (3) whether the record supports any claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106830 - 2014-01-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed constitutional violations. See State v. Oakley, 2001 WI 103, ¶23, 245 Wis. 2d 447, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182196 - 2017-09-21
claimed constitutional violations. See State v. Oakley, 2001 WI 103, ¶23, 245 Wis. 2d 447, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182196 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael D. Singleton
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31