Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17831 - 17840 of 58337 for speedy trial.
Search results 17831 - 17840 of 58337 for speedy trial.
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of a Schedule II controlled substance in violation of § 961.41(b), Stats.[2] She contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
of a Schedule II controlled substance in violation of § 961.41(b), Stats.[2] She contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
[PDF]
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy P.
is unconstitutional because it violates juveniles’ rights to: (1) trial by jury and procedural due process; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7296 - 2017-09-20
is unconstitutional because it violates juveniles’ rights to: (1) trial by jury and procedural due process; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7296 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of possession of a firearm by a felon. Warrior, by counsel, pled not guilty and requested a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371829 - 2021-06-02
of possession of a firearm by a felon. Warrior, by counsel, pled not guilty and requested a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371829 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Marquis D. Hudson
2 denying his motion for modification of sentence. Hudson argues that the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20510 - 2017-09-21
2 denying his motion for modification of sentence. Hudson argues that the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20510 - 2017-09-21
State v. Marquis D. Hudson
. Hudson argues that the trial court should have suppressed incriminating statements he made while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20510 - 2005-12-05
. Hudson argues that the trial court should have suppressed incriminating statements he made while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20510 - 2005-12-05
State v. Reuben G. May
postconviction relief. May argues that the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence and permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15676 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. May argues that the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence and permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15676 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial on both counts because the prosecutor, over Benton’s objection, presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194222 - 2017-09-21
is entitled to a new trial on both counts because the prosecutor, over Benton’s objection, presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194222 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John R. Maloney
for postconviction relief.1 He contends that he was afforded ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18528 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief.1 He contends that he was afforded ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18528 - 2017-09-21