Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17831 - 17840 of 38489 for t's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367735 - 2021-05-20

COURT OF APPEALS
) (1991-92)[4] imposed on the circuit court “a mandatory duty … to provide for restitution” and that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30637 - 2007-10-17

CA Blank Order
,” or when “[t]he party or the party’s attorney knew, or should have known, that the appeal … was without any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113119 - 2014-05-22

State v. Juan Mata
it is based on an unsupported assumption. When the actions of trial counsel are questioned, “[I]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231339 - 2018-12-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574051 - 2022-10-05

[PDF] State v. Daniel H. Frasch
at the original sentencing were not directed at the read-in burglary offense. The court stated: [I]t was my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10272 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Juan Mata
on an unsupported assumption. When the actions of trial counsel are questioned, “[I]t is incumbent upon one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Duwaine G.H.
. In his briefs, Duwaine makes the claim that “[t]here is no doubt that the condition in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11934 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 16, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257487 - 2020-04-16