Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17841 - 17850 of 30123 for de.
Search results 17841 - 17850 of 30123 for de.
[PDF]
Atlas Transit, Inc. v. Spence Korte
by a court de novo.” Woznicki, 202 Wis. 2d at 192. ¶10 The bus companies claim that MPS failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3566 - 2017-09-19
by a court de novo.” Woznicki, 202 Wis. 2d at 192. ¶10 The bus companies claim that MPS failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3566 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84993 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 102
were correct as a matter of law. See WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52688 - 2014-09-15
were correct as a matter of law. See WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52688 - 2014-09-15
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
that we review de novo. See Wolff v. Town of Jamestown, 229 Wis. 2d 738, 743, 601 N.W.2d 301 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See Wolff v. Town of Jamestown, 229 Wis. 2d 738, 743, 601 N.W.2d 301 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75760 - 2014-09-15
a complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 971.12.4 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28487 - 2014-09-15
. § 971.12.4 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28487 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 62
by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249452 - 2020-02-05
by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249452 - 2020-02-05
[PDF]
Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon
court's exercise of discretion, we review issues of law de novo. Id., ¶19. ¶11 Whether claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16691 - 2017-09-21
court's exercise of discretion, we review issues of law de novo. Id., ¶19. ¶11 Whether claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16691 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 72
, the interpretation of which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Zimmermann v. Thompson, 16 Wis. 2d 74
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37447 - 2014-09-15
, the interpretation of which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Zimmermann v. Thompson, 16 Wis. 2d 74
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37447 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Martel, 2003 WI 70, ¶8, 262 Wis. 2d 483
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38604 - 2014-09-15
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Martel, 2003 WI 70, ¶8, 262 Wis. 2d 483
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38604 - 2014-09-15