Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17861 - 17870 of 29712 for des.
Search results 17861 - 17870 of 29712 for des.
Ryan J. Enea v. James G. Linn, M.D.
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4495 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 634; State v. Harvey, 139 Wis. 2d 353, 376, 407 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76078 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 634; State v. Harvey, 139 Wis. 2d 353, 376, 407 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 44
de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46888 - 2014-09-15
de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46888 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on whether it has the power to hear an appeal, we are presented with a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31131 - 2008-01-29
on whether it has the power to hear an appeal, we are presented with a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31131 - 2008-01-29
State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
of law that we review de novo.” Id. “However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo.” Id. “However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16947 - 2005-03-31
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16947 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donald J. Kurylo v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
of review on summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15551 - 2017-09-21
of review on summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15551 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Randall
of “constitutional fact,” such as the ultimate issue in this case, de novo. See Evans, 187 Wis.2d at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19
of “constitutional fact,” such as the ultimate issue in this case, de novo. See Evans, 187 Wis.2d at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19
2006 WI APP 258
for reviewing interpretations of contractual provisions is de novo, see Everson v. Lorenz, 2005 WI 51, ¶10, 280
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27172 - 2006-12-19
for reviewing interpretations of contractual provisions is de novo, see Everson v. Lorenz, 2005 WI 51, ¶10, 280
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27172 - 2006-12-19