Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17861 - 17870 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 17861 - 17870 of 58500 for speedy trial.
State v. Michael F. Howard
of trial counsel when counsel failed to object to the State’s breach. We conclude that the State breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
of trial counsel when counsel failed to object to the State’s breach. We conclude that the State breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 124
of counsel, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective because he told No. 2013AP2559-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127414 - 2017-09-21
of counsel, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective because he told No. 2013AP2559-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127414 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 120
for absconding, it was error for the trial court to allow evidence of his absconding and to give the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36917 - 2014-09-15
for absconding, it was error for the trial court to allow evidence of his absconding and to give the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36917 - 2014-09-15
Daniel Williams v. Alan Rogers
of a partial summary judgment against it. It also appeals the results of a bench trial contained within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8382 - 2005-03-31
of a partial summary judgment against it. It also appeals the results of a bench trial contained within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8382 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ricky D. Loret
., following a jury trial. Loret raises two arguments on appeal. First, he claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14995 - 2017-09-21
., following a jury trial. Loret raises two arguments on appeal. First, he claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14995 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
[PDF]
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy P.
is unconstitutional because it violates juveniles’ rights to: (1) trial by jury and procedural due process; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7296 - 2017-09-20
is unconstitutional because it violates juveniles’ rights to: (1) trial by jury and procedural due process; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7296 - 2017-09-20
State v. Marquis D. Hudson
. Hudson argues that the trial court should have suppressed incriminating statements he made while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20510 - 2005-12-05
. Hudson argues that the trial court should have suppressed incriminating statements he made while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20510 - 2005-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of possession of a firearm by a felon. Warrior, by counsel, pled not guilty and requested a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371829 - 2021-06-02
of possession of a firearm by a felon. Warrior, by counsel, pled not guilty and requested a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371829 - 2021-06-02