Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17871 - 17880 of 30123 for de.

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. See HSBC Realty Credit Corp. v. City of Glendale, 2007 WI 94, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54399 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David Wilson
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12456 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Steven J. Burgess
reviews de novo. ¶9 The review of whether there was sufficient evidence to prove that an individual
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16442 - 2017-09-21

Kathleen Hacker v. State of Wisconsin DepartmentOf Health and Social Services
of a statute presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16861 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
is a question of law which we review de novo. Olson v. Town of Cottage Grove, 2008 WI 51, ¶38, 309 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268820 - 2020-07-14

[PDF] Connie G. Powell v. Arlene M. Cooper
questions of law which we review de novo. Arneson v. Jezwinski, ___ Wis.2d ___, 592 N.W.2d 606, 613 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13482 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 77
; Deborah Zuckerman and Michael Schuster, Washington D.C.; De Vonna Joy, Big Bend; Jeffrey R. Myer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33271 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
- D-Mix Concrete, Inc., 2013 WI 72, ¶12, 349 Wis. 2d 587, 836 N.W.2d 807. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368510 - 2021-05-20

[PDF] State v. Brent R. Reed
determination this court reviews de novo. State v. Gaudesi, 112 Wis. 2d 213, 219-21, 332 N.W.2d 302 (1983
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17932 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
(1995)). Whether such a duty exists is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Coffey v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16386 - 2017-09-21