Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17871 - 17880 of 68502 for did.
Search results 17871 - 17880 of 68502 for did.
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
. ¶13 Applying this standard, we conclude that the State did not furnish a reasonably specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2842 - 2014-03-09
. ¶13 Applying this standard, we conclude that the State did not furnish a reasonably specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2842 - 2014-03-09
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
did not believe that to be correct, and asked again for Hatcher’s name. The response was the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2014-12-17
did not believe that to be correct, and asked again for Hatcher’s name. The response was the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2014-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
claim for plea withdrawal because he did not understand the elements of the offense or the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2005-03-31
claim for plea withdrawal because he did not understand the elements of the offense or the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2005-03-31
State v. Damien Rudebush
into evidence. Because we conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21708 - 2014-03-13
into evidence. Because we conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21708 - 2014-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS
a manifest injustice justifying plea withdrawal because he did not understand important legal principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34196 - 2008-10-01
a manifest injustice justifying plea withdrawal because he did not understand important legal principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34196 - 2008-10-01
[PDF]
Frontsheet
at the core right of the Second Amendment because he did not act in self- defense. Moreover, we conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363657 - 2021-07-13
at the core right of the Second Amendment because he did not act in self- defense. Moreover, we conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363657 - 2021-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but the record shows that the circuit court did make such a decision. The circuit court stated in its oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242455 - 2019-06-20
, but the record shows that the circuit court did make such a decision. The circuit court stated in its oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242455 - 2019-06-20
[PDF]
Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA Associates
, J., joins the concurrence. DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING: WILCOX, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25536 - 2017-09-21
, J., joins the concurrence. DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING: WILCOX, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25536 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
when it concluded that facts related to Harbor's addiction issues and her traumatic upbringing did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63767 - 2011-05-09
when it concluded that facts related to Harbor's addiction issues and her traumatic upbringing did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63767 - 2011-05-09
2011 WI APP 13
or a year prior. Ilana also acknowledged that she was prescribed medication but did not continue to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57550 - 2012-01-22
or a year prior. Ilana also acknowledged that she was prescribed medication but did not continue to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57550 - 2012-01-22