Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17871 - 17880 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 17871 - 17880 of 58500 for speedy trial.
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
of conviction and to order a new trial.[1] I ¶3 On March 24, 1981, Ralph Armstrong was convicted of first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18982 - 2005-07-11
[PDF]
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
with directions to grant Armstrong's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18982 - 2017-09-21
State v. Reuben G. May
postconviction relief. May argues that the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence and permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15676 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. May argues that the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence and permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15676 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John R. Maloney
for postconviction relief.1 He contends that he was afforded ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18528 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief.1 He contends that he was afforded ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18528 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dale H. Chu
, sufficiency of the evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel and the trial court’s admission of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4200 - 2005-03-31
, sufficiency of the evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel and the trial court’s admission of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial on both counts because the prosecutor, over Benton’s objection, presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194222 - 2017-09-21
is entitled to a new trial on both counts because the prosecutor, over Benton’s objection, presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194222 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Reuben G. May
postconviction relief. May argues that the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15676 - 2017-09-21
postconviction relief. May argues that the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
) the sentencing court relied on improper factors and (2) his trial counsel was ineffective. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53429 - 2014-09-15
) the sentencing court relied on improper factors and (2) his trial counsel was ineffective. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53429 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Judith L. Kiernan
)(a), (b) (1997-98). 2 Kiernan pled not guilty and requested a jury trial. ¶3 Sheboygan County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17298 - 2017-09-21
)(a), (b) (1997-98). 2 Kiernan pled not guilty and requested a jury trial. ¶3 Sheboygan County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bobby D. Salas
credibility, requiring a new trial in the interest of justice, (3) the circuit court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7212 - 2017-09-20
credibility, requiring a new trial in the interest of justice, (3) the circuit court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7212 - 2017-09-20