Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17881 - 17890 of 84000 for case search.
Search results 17881 - 17890 of 84000 for case search.
David K. Kalan v. City of St. Francis
the appeal frivolous, and award the City attorney fees as costs. The case is remanded to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8726 - 2005-03-31
the appeal frivolous, and award the City attorney fees as costs. The case is remanded to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8726 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David K. Kalan v. City of St. Francis
frivolous, and award the City attorney fees as costs. The case is remanded to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
frivolous, and award the City attorney fees as costs. The case is remanded to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Armstead should be 2 This case relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213505 - 2018-05-30
that Armstead should be 2 This case relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213505 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
State v. David Thompson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10238 - 2017-09-20
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10238 - 2017-09-20
State v. David Thompson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Burkett’s conviction in this case and two other cases). His conviction has not been overturned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199830 - 2017-10-27
Burkett’s conviction in this case and two other cases). His conviction has not been overturned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199830 - 2017-10-27
Mark J. Santner v. Debbie Mitchell
it violated double jeopardy. Because the facts and circumstances under this case do not satisfy the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31
it violated double jeopardy. Because the facts and circumstances under this case do not satisfy the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Juergen Huebner
2000 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-2470-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17426 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-2470-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17426 - 2017-09-21
State v. Juergen Huebner
2000 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-2470-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17426 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-2470-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17426 - 2005-03-31
State v. Hayes Johnson
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1360-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17259 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1360-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17259 - 2005-03-31