Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1791 - 1800 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 1791 - 1800 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
WI 120
and ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding, which totaled $14,396.78 as of August 1, 2012. ¶3 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89817 - 2014-09-15
and ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding, which totaled $14,396.78 as of August 1, 2012. ¶3 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89817 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 165
, the parties filed competing motions after verdict related to attorney fees and costs. The Stys sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
, the parties filed competing motions after verdict related to attorney fees and costs. The Stys sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, cost, or availability of housing in this state, the department [of commerce] shall prepare a report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109502 - 2017-09-21
, cost, or availability of housing in this state, the department [of commerce] shall prepare a report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109502 - 2017-09-21
Mark Regal v. General Motors Corporation
as provided in § 218.0171(7). It also included attorney’s fees, and double costs and disbursements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5016 - 2005-03-31
as provided in § 218.0171(7). It also included attorney’s fees, and double costs and disbursements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5016 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
that Attorney Gorokhovsky be publicly reprimanded and ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding, which totaled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89817 - 2013-03-11
that Attorney Gorokhovsky be publicly reprimanded and ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding, which totaled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89817 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
Mark Regal v. General Motors Corporation
of Regal’s pecuniary loss as provided in § 218.0171(7). It also included attorney’s fees, and double costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5016 - 2017-09-19
of Regal’s pecuniary loss as provided in § 218.0171(7). It also included attorney’s fees, and double costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5016 - 2017-09-19
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ted Ricci
Hoey’s costs and reasonable attorney fees because Ricci maintained a frivolous defense. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4300 - 2005-03-31
Hoey’s costs and reasonable attorney fees because Ricci maintained a frivolous defense. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4300 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 165
after verdict related to attorney fees and costs. The Stys sought attorney fees under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42630 - 2011-02-07
after verdict related to attorney fees and costs. The Stys sought attorney fees under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42630 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ted Ricci
on the billboard. Finally, the judgment requires Ricci to pay Hoey’s costs and reasonable attorney fees because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4300 - 2017-09-19
on the billboard. Finally, the judgment requires Ricci to pay Hoey’s costs and reasonable attorney fees because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4300 - 2017-09-19
Randie Rowell v. Aldred Ash
for sampling services. Minimum future compliance costs were going to be incurred in the sum of $3,900
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14609 - 2005-03-31
for sampling services. Minimum future compliance costs were going to be incurred in the sum of $3,900
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14609 - 2005-03-31