Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1791 - 1800 of 3268 for paine.

[PDF] Frontsheet
."). No. 2020AP704.jjk 2 intentional infliction of physical pain or injury.2 Yet, despite Doubek's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524434 - 2022-06-15

[PDF] WI App 112
to alleviate pain from his spinal injury began to interfere with his ability to stay awake and alert at work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65775 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Charles Hoecherl
of his perceived mistreatment, not an intent to inflict physical pain on the prison staff.” Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13325 - 2017-09-21

Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah (Kahn) v. Gary R. McCaughtry
the circumstances before us, caused “the ‘unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.’” See Whitley v. Albers, 475
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14667 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah (Kahn) v. Gary R. McCaughtry
infliction of pain.’” See Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312, 319 (1986) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14667 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of vaginal discharge, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. She was not seeing Saunders for any type of sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103830 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles Hoecherl
of his perceived mistreatment, not an intent to inflict physical pain on the prison staff.” Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13326 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
, Nicholas' pain and suffering, the loss of services and financial support suffered by his survivors
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113723 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles Hoecherl
defense, which “reflected protest of his perceived mistreatment, not an intent to inflict physical pain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13326 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
such as pain and suffering, anguish or humiliation,’ damages crime victims often experience.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910382 - 2025-02-04